2004 Audi TT vs. 1996 Rover 400

To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 400 would be higher. At 1,993 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Rover 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (225 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1996 Rover 400. (85 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi TT weights approximately 355 kg more than 1996 Rover 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Rover 400. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (281 Nm) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 400. (170 Nm). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 400.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Audi TT 1996 Rover 400
Make Audi Rover
Model TT 400
Year Released 2004 1996
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1754 cc 1993 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 225 HP 85 HP
Engine RPM 6300 RPM 4500 RPM
Torque 281 Nm 170 Nm
Drive Type 4WD Front
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1575 kg 1220 kg
Vehicle Length 4050 mm 4320 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 2430 mm 2630 mm