2004 Audi TT vs. 1996 Saturn SL
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Saturn SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Saturn SL would be higher. At 1,901 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Saturn SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (148 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1996 Saturn SL. (100 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1996 Saturn SL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi TT weights approximately 284 kg more than 1996 Saturn SL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (195 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Saturn SL. (158 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Saturn SL.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 1996 Saturn SL | |
Make | Audi | Saturn |
Model | TT | SL |
Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1780 cc | 1901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 195 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1056 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |