2004 Audi TT vs. 1998 Rover 75
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 75 would be higher. At 1,950 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1998 Rover 75. (116 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Rover 75 weights approximately 160 kg more than 2004 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Rover 75 (260 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi TT. (225 Nm). This means 1998 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 1998 Rover 75 | |
Make | Audi | Rover |
Model | TT | 75 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1754 cc | 1950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 225 Nm | 260 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 19.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 1485 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 66 L |