2004 Audi TT vs. 1999 Rover 75
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Rover 75 would be higher. At 1,795 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1999 Rover 75. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1999 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Rover 75 weights approximately 65 kg more than 2004 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (225 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Rover 75. (160 Nm). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 1999 Rover 75 | |
Make | Audi | Rover |
Model | TT | 75 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1754 cc | 1795 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 225 Nm | 160 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2750 mm |