2004 Audi TT vs. 2000 BMW Z9
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW Z9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW Z9 would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z9 (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2004 Audi TT. (225 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z9 should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi TT.
Because 2004 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 BMW Z9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW Z9 (440 Nm) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi TT. (281 Nm). This means 2000 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 2000 BMW Z9 | |
Make | Audi | BMW |
Model | TT | Z9 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1754 cc | 4398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 282 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 281 Nm | 440 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 82.7 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3110 mm |