2004 Audi TT vs. 2000 Oldsmobile Profile
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Oldsmobile Profile. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Oldsmobile Profile would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile Profile is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (225 HP) has 19 more horse power than 2000 Oldsmobile Profile. (206 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2000 Oldsmobile Profile. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi TT weights approximately 15 kg more than 2000 Oldsmobile Profile. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile (353 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi TT. (281 Nm). This means 2000 Oldsmobile Profile will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi TT | 2000 Oldsmobile Profile | |
| Make | Audi | Oldsmobile |
| Model | TT | Profile |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1754 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 206 HP |
| Torque | 281 Nm | 353 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2880 mm |
