2004 Audi TT vs. 2001 Rover 75
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Rover 75 would be higher. At 1,768 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (178 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2001 Rover 75. (122 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2001 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Rover 75 weights approximately 55 kg more than 2004 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (240 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Rover 75. (160 Nm). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 2001 Rover 75 | |
Make | Audi | Rover |
Model | TT | 75 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1754 cc | 1768 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 160 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1475 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2830 mm |