2004 Audi TT vs. 2002 Eagle Vision
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Eagle Vision. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Eagle Vision would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (225 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2002 Eagle Vision. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2002 Eagle Vision. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi TT weights approximately 5 kg more than 2002 Eagle Vision. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Eagle Vision. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 2002 Eagle Vision | |
Make | Audi | Eagle |
Model | TT | Vision |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1754 cc | 2700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |