2004 Audi TT vs. 2002 Nissan R 390 GT1
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Nissan R 390 GT1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Nissan R 390 GT1 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2002 Nissan R 390 GT1 (543 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 318 more horse power than 2004 Audi TT. (225 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Nissan R 390 GT1 should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi TT weights approximately 471 kg more than 2002 Nissan R 390 GT1.
Because 2004 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Nissan R 390 GT1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Nissan R 390 GT1 (637 Nm) has 356 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi TT. (281 Nm). This means 2002 Nissan R 390 GT1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 2002 Nissan R 390 GT1 | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | TT | R 390 GT1 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 543 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 281 Nm | 637 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1104 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2730 mm |