2004 Audi TT vs. 2002 Tata Safari
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Tata Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Tata Safari would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (250 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 2002 Tata Safari. (136 HP @ 5530 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2002 Tata Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Tata Safari weights approximately 516 kg more than 2004 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (320 Nm) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Tata Safari. (181 Nm). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Tata Safari.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 2002 Tata Safari | |
Make | Audi | Tata |
Model | TT | Safari |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 1948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 136 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5530 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 181 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 2040 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2660 mm |