2004 Audi TT vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (250 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (195 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 240 kg more than 2004 Audi TT.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (320 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (312 Nm). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | TT | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 312 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 8.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 1764 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.7 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.7 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 78 L |