2004 Audi TT vs. 2006 Ford F-250
To start off, 2006 Ford F-250 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi TT would be higher. At 4,198 cc, 2006 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (225 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2006 Ford F-250. (177 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford F-250.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford F-250 (500 Nm) has 219 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi TT. (281 Nm). This means 2006 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 2006 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | TT | F-250 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1754 cc | 4198 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 281 Nm | 500 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 103 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 17.8:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 6250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2060 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 2040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3970 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 114 L |