2004 Audi TT vs. 2006 Isuzu KB
To start off, 2006 Isuzu KB is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi TT would be higher. At 3,494 cc, 2006 Isuzu KB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (225 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu KB. (197 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Because 2004 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Isuzu KB. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 281 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 2006 Isuzu KB | |
Make | Audi | Isuzu |
Model | TT | KB |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1754 cc | 3494 cc |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 281 Nm | 281 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 93.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 76 L |