2004 Audi TT vs. 2006 Lancia Phedra
To start off, 2006 Lancia Phedra is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi TT would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Lancia Phedra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2006 Lancia Phedra. (134 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2006 Lancia Phedra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Lancia Phedra weights approximately 287 kg more than 2004 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (225 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Lancia Phedra. (190 Nm). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Lancia Phedra.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 2006 Lancia Phedra | |
Make | Audi | Lancia |
Model | TT | Phedra |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1754 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 225 Nm | 190 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 1612 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 80 L |