2004 Audi TT vs. 2006 Nissan M
To start off, 2006 Nissan M is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi TT would be higher. At 4,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Nissan M is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan M (462 Nm) has 267 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi TT. (195 Nm). This means 2006 Nissan M will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi TT. 2006 Nissan M has automatic transmission and 2004 Audi TT has manual transmission. 2004 Audi TT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Nissan M will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi TT | 2006 Nissan M | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | TT | M |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1780 cc | 4500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 195 Nm | 462 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1830 mm |
