2004 Audi TT vs. 2008 Chevrolet Blazer
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi TT would be higher. At 4,300 cc, 2008 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 352 kg more than 2004 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Blazer (340 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi TT. (320 Nm). This means 2008 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 2008 Chevrolet Blazer | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | TT | Blazer |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 4300 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 340 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 88.4 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 1876 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 68 L |