2004 Audi TT vs. 2008 Chrysler Voyager
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi TT would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chrysler Voyager weights approximately 340 kg more than 2004 Audi TT.
Because 2004 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Chrysler Voyager. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (281 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chrysler Voyager. (219 Nm). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chrysler Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 2008 Chrysler Voyager | |
Make | Audi | Chrysler |
Model | TT | Voyager |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1754 cc | 2429 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 281 Nm | 219 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 101 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.4 L/100km | 10.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 75 L |