2004 Audi TT vs. 2008 Mazda 6
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi TT would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2008 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (225 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2008 Mazda 6. (143 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda 6.
Because 2004 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (281 Nm) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 6. (177 Nm). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 2008 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | TT | 6 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1754 cc | 1999 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 281 Nm | 177 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.8:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.4 L/100km | 10.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 64 L |