2004 Audi TT vs. 2008 Mazda DrifterX
To start off, 2008 Mazda DrifterX is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi TT would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda DrifterX weights approximately 56 kg more than 2004 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (320 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda DrifterX. (257 Nm). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda DrifterX.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 2008 Mazda DrifterX | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | TT | DrifterX |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 257 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 21.6:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 13.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 80 L |