2004 Audi TT vs. 2008 Volvo S60
To start off, 2008 Volvo S60 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi TT would be higher. At 2,319 cc (5 cylinders), 2008 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi TT weights approximately 135 kg more than 2008 Volvo S60.
Because 2004 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Volvo S60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volvo S60 (330 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi TT. (281 Nm). This means 2008 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 2008 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Audi | Volvo |
Model | TT | S60 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1754 cc | 2319 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 281 Nm | 330 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.4 L/100km | 13.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 70 L |