2004 Audi TT vs. 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser
To start off, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi TT would be higher. At 2,397 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (225 HP) has 47 more horse power than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. (178 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser.
Because 2004 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (281 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. (210 Nm). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser | |
Make | Audi | Chrysler |
Model | TT | PT Dream Cruiser |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1754 cc | 2397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 178 HP |
Torque | 281 Nm | 210 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 101 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2000 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.6 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.9 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |