2004 Audi TT vs. 2010 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2010 Dodge Ram is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi TT would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (250 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2010 Dodge Ram. (212 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2010 Dodge Ram.
Because 2004 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Dodge Ram. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (320 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Dodge Ram. (235 Nm). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Dodge Ram.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi TT | 2010 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Audi | Dodge |
| Model | TT | Ram |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3196 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 212 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 235 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 88.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 100 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 9.7:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2900 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 98 L |
