2004 Audi TT vs. 2010 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2010 Ford C-Max is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi TT would be higher. At 1,754 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (178 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2010 Ford C-Max. (105 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford C-Max. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford C-Max weights approximately 130 kg more than 2004 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (240 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford C-Max. (150 Nm). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford C-Max.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 2010 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | TT | C-Max |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1754 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 150 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2788 mm |