2004 Audi TT vs. 2010 Lincoln MKS
To start off, 2010 Lincoln MKS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi TT would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Lincoln MKS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Lincoln MKS (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 2004 Audi TT. (180 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Lincoln MKS should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Lincoln MKS weights approximately 558 kg more than 2004 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Lincoln MKS (366 Nm) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi TT. (225 Nm). This means 2010 Lincoln MKS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 2010 Lincoln MKS | |
Make | Audi | Lincoln |
Model | TT | MKS |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1754 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 225 Nm | 366 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 1883 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5184 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1928 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1565 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2868 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.1 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 76 L |