2004 Audi TT vs. 2010 SsangYong Chairman W
To start off, 2010 SsangYong Chairman W is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi TT would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 SsangYong Chairman W is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (225 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2010 SsangYong Chairman W. (222 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2010 SsangYong Chairman W.
Because 2004 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 SsangYong Chairman W. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 SsangYong Chairman W (296 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi TT. (281 Nm). This means 2010 SsangYong Chairman W will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi TT | 2010 SsangYong Chairman W | |
| Make | Audi | SsangYong |
| Model | TT | Chairman W |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1754 cc | 3199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 222 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6600 RPM |
| Torque | 281 Nm | 296 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1895 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1495 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2970 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.4 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
