2004 Audi TT vs. 2011 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi TT would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (250 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 2011 Chevrolet Orlando. (139 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2011 Chevrolet Orlando. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet Orlando weights approximately 4 kg more than 2004 Audi TT.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (320 Nm) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Chevrolet Orlando. (176 Nm). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Chevrolet Orlando.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 2011 Chevrolet Orlando | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | TT | Orlando |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 176 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 88.2 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 1528 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4652 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1633 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2760 mm |