2004 Audi TT vs. 2011 Mazda RX-8

To start off, 2011 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi TT would be higher. At 1,754 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda RX-8 (212 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2004 Audi TT. (178 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi TT weights approximately 9 kg more than 2011 Mazda RX-8.

Because 2011 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (240 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Mazda RX-8. (215 Nm). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Mazda RX-8. 2011 Mazda RX-8 has automatic transmission and 2004 Audi TT has manual transmission. 2004 Audi TT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Mazda RX-8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Audi TT 2011 Mazda RX-8
Make Audi Mazda
Model TT RX-8
Year Released 2004 2011
Body Type Convertible Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1754 cc 1300 cc
Engine Type in-line dual-disk rotary
Horse Power 178 HP 212 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 7500 RPM
Torque 240 Nm 215 Nm
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 2 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1420 kg 1411 kg
Vehicle Length 4050 mm 4460 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1770 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1341 mm
Wheelbase Size 2410 mm 2703 mm
Fuel Consumption 8.4 L/100km 10.2 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 11.8 L/100km 14.7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L 64 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]