2004 Audi TT vs. 2012 Audi A8
To start off, 2012 Audi A8 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi TT would be higher. At 6,300 cc (12 cylinders), 2012 Audi A8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A8 (500 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 275 more horse power than 2004 Audi TT. (225 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A8 should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi TT.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi A8 (627 Nm) has 346 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi TT. (281 Nm). This means 2012 Audi A8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 2012 Audi A8 | |
Make | Audi | Audi |
Model | TT | A8 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1754 cc | 6300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 500 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 281 Nm | 627 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5268 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1948 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3122 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.6 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.9 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 90 L |