2004 Audi TT vs. 2012 BMW 328
To start off, 2012 BMW 328 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi TT would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (250 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2012 BMW 328. (230 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2012 BMW 328. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 BMW 328 weights approximately 101 kg more than 2004 Audi TT.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (320 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 BMW 328. (271 Nm). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 BMW 328.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 2012 BMW 328 | |
Make | Audi | BMW |
Model | TT | 328 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 2979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 271 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 89.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 84 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 1625 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4624 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1811 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.7 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 57 L |