2004 Audi TT vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi TT would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (250 HP) has 10 more horse power than 2012 Holden Commodore. (240 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Commodore.
Because 2004 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (320 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | TT | Commodore |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |