2004 Audi TT vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi TT would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2004 Audi TT. (225 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi TT.
Because 2004 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (281 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | TT | Commodore |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1754 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 281 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.4 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |