2004 Audi TT vs. 2012 Opel Combo
To start off, 2012 Opel Combo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi TT would be higher. At 1,754 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (225 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 2012 Opel Combo. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2012 Opel Combo.
Because 2004 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Opel Combo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (281 Nm) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Opel Combo. (126 Nm). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Opel Combo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 2012 Opel Combo | |
Make | Audi | Opel |
Model | TT | Combo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1754 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 281 Nm | 126 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 73.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 80.6 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.4 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 52 L |