2004 Audi TT vs. 2013 BMW M6
To start off, 2013 BMW M6 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi TT would be higher. At 4,395 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 BMW M6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 BMW M6 (552 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 372 more horse power than 2004 Audi TT. (180 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 BMW M6 should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 BMW M6 weights approximately 605 kg more than 2004 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 BMW M6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 BMW M6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 BMW M6 (678 Nm) has 453 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi TT. (225 Nm). This means 2013 BMW M6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi TT | 2013 BMW M6 | |
| Make | Audi | BMW |
| Model | TT | M6 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1754 cc | 4395 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 552 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 225 Nm | 678 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0 :1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 1930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4903 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2106 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1374 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2851 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.1 L/100km | 8.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 80 L |
