2004 Audi TT vs. 2013 GMC Acadia
To start off, 2013 GMC Acadia is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi TT would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 GMC Acadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 GMC Acadia (284 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 2004 Audi TT. (225 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 GMC Acadia should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 GMC Acadia weights approximately 628 kg more than 2004 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 GMC Acadia (366 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi TT. (281 Nm). This means 2013 GMC Acadia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi TT | 2013 GMC Acadia | |
| Make | Audi | GMC |
| Model | TT | Acadia |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1754 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 284 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 281 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 85 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 2203 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5101 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2003 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1846 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3020 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.6 L/100km | 8.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.9 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 83 L |
