2004 Audi TT vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi TT would be higher. In terms of performance, 2013 Lotus Evora (276 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 2004 Audi TT. (225 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi TT weights approximately 189 kg more than 2013 Lotus Evora.
Because 2004 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Lotus Evora. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lotus Evora (350 Nm) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi TT. (281 Nm). This means 2013 Lotus Evora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi TT | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
| Make | Audi | Lotus |
| Model | TT | Evora |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 281 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 83 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1386 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2047 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1229 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2575 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.6 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.9 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 60 L |
