2004 Audi TT vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi TT would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi TT weights approximately 97 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (281 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (240 Nm). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi TT | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
| Make | Audi | Mini |
| Model | TT | Countryman |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 281 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 85 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1478 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1561 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2595 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.6 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.9 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 47 L |
