2004 Avanti Studebaker vs. 2000 BMW 528
To start off, 2004 Avanti Studebaker is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW 528. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW 528 would be higher. At 6,750 cc (10 cylinders), 2004 Avanti Studebaker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 528 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2004 Avanti Studebaker. (306 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 528 should accelerate faster than 2004 Avanti Studebaker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Avanti Studebaker weights approximately 1105 kg more than 2000 BMW 528.
Because 2004 Avanti Studebaker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 BMW 528. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Avanti Studebaker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Avanti Studebaker (425 Nm) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW 528. (279 Nm). This means 2004 Avanti Studebaker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW 528.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Avanti Studebaker | 2000 BMW 528 | |
Make | Avanti | BMW |
Model | Studebaker | 528 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 2926 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 306 HP | 328 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 7400 RPM |
Torque | 425 Nm | 279 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2775 kg | 1670 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5490 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2040 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3410 mm | 2840 mm |