2004 Avanti Studebaker vs. 2002 BMW M3

To start off, 2004 Avanti Studebaker is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW M3 would be higher. At 6,750 cc (10 cylinders), 2004 Avanti Studebaker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 2004 Avanti Studebaker. (306 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Avanti Studebaker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Avanti Studebaker weights approximately 1675 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.

Because 2004 Avanti Studebaker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Avanti Studebaker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Avanti Studebaker. (425 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Avanti Studebaker. 2004 Avanti Studebaker has automatic transmission and 2002 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 2002 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Avanti Studebaker will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: