2004 Avanti Studebaker vs. 2006 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Avanti Studebaker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Avanti Studebaker would be higher. At 6,750 cc (10 cylinders), 2004 Avanti Studebaker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 2004 Avanti Studebaker. (306 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2004 Avanti Studebaker.
Because 2004 Avanti Studebaker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Avanti Studebaker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Avanti Studebaker. (425 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Avanti Studebaker.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Avanti Studebaker | 2006 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Avanti | Cadillac |
Model | Studebaker | CTS |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 5965 cc |
Horse Power | 306 HP | 400 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 425 Nm | 536 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5490 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2040 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3410 mm | 2890 mm |