2004 Avanti Studebaker vs. 2013 BMW X6 M
To start off, 2013 BMW X6 M is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Avanti Studebaker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Avanti Studebaker would be higher. At 6,750 cc (10 cylinders), 2004 Avanti Studebaker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 BMW X6 M (547 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 241 more horse power than 2004 Avanti Studebaker. (306 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 BMW X6 M should accelerate faster than 2004 Avanti Studebaker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Avanti Studebaker weights approximately 360 kg more than 2013 BMW X6 M.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 BMW X6 M (678 Nm @ 5650 RPM) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Avanti Studebaker. (425 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2013 BMW X6 M will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Avanti Studebaker.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Avanti Studebaker | 2013 BMW X6 M | |
Make | Avanti | BMW |
Model | Studebaker | X6 M |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 4395 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 306 HP | 547 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 425 Nm | 678 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 5650 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2775 kg | 2415 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5490 mm | 4876 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2195 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2040 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3410 mm | 2933 mm |