2004 Bentley Arnage vs. 1969 Opel GT
To start off, 2004 Bentley Arnage is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Opel GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Opel GT would be higher. At 6,752 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Bentley Arnage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Bentley Arnage (401 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 300 more horse power than 1969 Opel GT. (101 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Bentley Arnage should accelerate faster than 1969 Opel GT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Bentley Arnage (835 Nm) has 678 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Opel GT. (157 Nm). This means 2004 Bentley Arnage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Opel GT.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Bentley Arnage | 1969 Opel GT | |
Make | Bentley | Opel |
Model | Arnage | GT |
Year Released | 2004 | 1969 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6752 cc | 1900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 401 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 835 Nm | 157 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 104 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99 mm | 69.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1230 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3370 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 16.8 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 23.5 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 19.6 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 53 L |