2004 Bentley Arnage vs. 2000 Holden GTS-R
To start off, 2004 Bentley Arnage is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden GTS-R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden GTS-R would be higher. At 6,752 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Bentley Arnage is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Bentley Arnage is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Bentley Arnage. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden GTS-R, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Bentley Arnage (835 Nm) has 191 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Holden GTS-R. (644 Nm). This means 2004 Bentley Arnage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Holden GTS-R.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Bentley Arnage | 2000 Holden GTS-R | |
| Make | Bentley | Holden |
| Model | Arnage | GTS-R |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6752 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 401 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 835 Nm | 644 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
