2004 Bentley Arnage vs. 2008 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Bentley Arnage. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Bentley Arnage would be higher. At 6,752 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Bentley Arnage is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Bentley Arnage weights approximately 677 kg more than 2008 Jeep Cherokee.
Because 2008 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Bentley Arnage. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Bentley Arnage (835 Nm) has 492 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Jeep Cherokee. (343 Nm). This means 2004 Bentley Arnage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Jeep Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Bentley Arnage | 2008 Jeep Cherokee | |
| Make | Bentley | Jeep |
| Model | Arnage | Cherokee |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6752 cc | 2499 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 401 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 835 Nm | 343 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 104 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 99 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.8:1 | 17.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2655 kg | 1978 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3370 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 19.6 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 70 L |
