2004 Bentley Arnage vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Bentley Arnage. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Bentley Arnage would be higher. At 6,752 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Bentley Arnage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Bentley Arnage (401 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 2009 Mazda CX-9. (268 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Bentley Arnage should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda CX-9.
Because 2004 Bentley Arnage is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Bentley Arnage. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Bentley Arnage (835 Nm) has 566 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda CX-9. (269 Nm). This means 2004 Bentley Arnage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda CX-9.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Bentley Arnage | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Bentley | Mazda |
Model | Arnage | CX-9 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6752 cc | 3727 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 401 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 835 Nm | 269 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3370 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 16.8 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 23.5 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 76 L |