2004 Bentley Arnage vs. 2009 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2009 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Bentley Arnage. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Bentley Arnage would be higher. At 6,752 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Bentley Arnage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Bentley Arnage (401 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 2009 Toyota Sequoia. (272 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Bentley Arnage should accelerate faster than 2009 Toyota Sequoia.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Bentley Arnage (835 Nm) has 520 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Toyota Sequoia. (315 Nm). This means 2004 Bentley Arnage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Toyota Sequoia.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Bentley Arnage | 2009 Toyota Sequoia | |
Make | Bentley | Toyota |
Model | Arnage | Sequoia |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6752 cc | 4664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 401 HP | 272 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 835 Nm | 315 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 2040 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 16.8 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 23.5 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |