2004 Bentley Arnage vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Bentley Arnage. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Bentley Arnage would be higher. At 6,752 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Bentley Arnage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Bentley Arnage (401 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 2013 Cadillac CTS. (314 HP @ 6800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Bentley Arnage should accelerate faster than 2013 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Bentley Arnage weights approximately 787 kg more than 2013 Cadillac CTS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Bentley Arnage. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Bentley Arnage (835 Nm) has 462 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Cadillac CTS. (373 Nm). This means 2004 Bentley Arnage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Bentley Arnage | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Bentley | Cadillac |
Model | Arnage | CTS |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6752 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 401 HP | 314 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 835 Nm | 373 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 104 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.8:1 | 11.3 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2655 kg | 1868 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3370 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 16.8 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 23.5 L/100km | 13 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 19.6 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 68 L |