2004 Bentley Arnage vs. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Bentley Arnage. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Bentley Arnage would be higher. At 6,752 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Bentley Arnage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Bentley Arnage (401 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2013 Chevrolet Camaro. (319 HP @ 6800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Bentley Arnage should accelerate faster than 2013 Chevrolet Camaro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Bentley Arnage weights approximately 845 kg more than 2013 Chevrolet Camaro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Bentley Arnage (835 Nm) has 458 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Chevrolet Camaro. (377 Nm). This means 2004 Bentley Arnage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Bentley Arnage | 2013 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Bentley | Chevrolet |
Model | Arnage | Camaro |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6752 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 401 HP | 319 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 835 Nm | 377 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 104 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.8:1 | 11.5 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2655 kg | 1810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4836 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1918 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1377 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3370 mm | 2852 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 16.8 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 23.5 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 19.6 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 72 L |