2004 Bentley Arnage vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Bentley Arnage. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Bentley Arnage would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 44 kg more than 2004 Bentley Arnage.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Bentley Arnage (875 Nm @ 2150 RPM) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom. (720 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Bentley Arnage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Bentley Arnage | 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
Make | Bentley | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Arnage | Phantom |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 401 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5350 RPM |
Torque | 875 Nm | 720 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2150 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 104.2 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.1 mm | 84 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 8-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2585 kg | 2629 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 5612 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1987 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1598 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 3320 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 16.8 L/100km | 10.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 23.5 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 100 L |