2004 BMW 120 vs. 1958 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 2004 BMW 120 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac Eldorado (204 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2004 BMW 120. (141 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 2004 BMW 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 855 kg more than 2004 BMW 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 BMW 120 | 1958 Cadillac Eldorado | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 120 | Eldorado |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 5980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 204 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1335 kg | 2190 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 5650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2030 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 3300 mm |
