2004 BMW 120 vs. 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora
To start off, 2004 BMW 120 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora would be higher. At 3,473 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora weights approximately 294 kg more than 2004 BMW 120.
Because 2004 BMW 120 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 BMW 120. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 120 | 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora | |
Make | BMW | Oldsmobile |
Model | 120 | Aurora |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 3473 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1644 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 5230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2900 mm |